We don't want Taylor

Not because he isn't any good because he is but because it is plainly obvious if there is one club he would like to join it is you. If we did want him we would have bid by now and Brady would have told the world how derisory our bid was etc etc. More rubbish paper talk....again.

Posted By: Icomeinpeace on January 9th 2008 at 13:38:10

Message Thread

We don't want Taylor (NCFC) - Icomeinpeace, Jan 9, 13:38:10
- I can see us not bothering cos of the silly trout's rant in the tabloids (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 9, 13:46:20
  - I can't. I can see us not bothering because we can't agree on a fee. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 9, 13:47:49
    - I can see us not bothering as GR thinks he can get a better defender for less money (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jan 9, 13:51:14
      - Can't we just stick XXL16 between the posts ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Jan 9, 13:52:11
      - To be honest, I think we need two ! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 9, 13:51:47
- Did Peace know? (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 9, 13:40:56
  - He mis-spelled Pearce (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 9, 13:45:19
- QPR? (n/m) (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, Jan 9, 13:38:43

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.