i agree
smith out of position but looked ok, but croft just runs into defenders all the time
Posted By: strap_on sally on December 9th 2007 at 17:04:24
Message Thread
- great 3 points yesterday.not sure what smith brings to the party.would rather see croft (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Dec 9, 16:59:44
- or of course chadwick when fit (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Dec 9, 17:14:21
- smith looked fine yesterday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 9, 17:01:37
- smith gave us no width and didnt do much that i noticed (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Dec 9, 17:04:49
- hence he was subbed after 60 mins! (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Dec 9, 17:09:01
- so players are only subbed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 9, 17:10:58
- not always but i didnt think he was offering alot (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Dec 9, 17:12:13
- so players are only subbed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 9, 17:10:58
- as opposed to croft who did absolutely nothing (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 9, 17:08:41
- a few weeks ago people on here saying croft should be in.rather him than smith imo (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Dec 9, 17:11:06
- a few weeks ago (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 9, 17:22:20
- a few weeks ago people on here saying croft should be in.rather him than smith imo (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Dec 9, 17:11:06
- hence he was subbed after 60 mins! (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Dec 9, 17:09:01
- i agree (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Dec 9, 17:04:24
- smith gave us no width and didnt do much that i noticed (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Dec 9, 17:04:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.