why can't they say that 3 in 4 children are average or under weight, that's a bit more - Wrath of the Barclay

why can't they say that 3 in 4 children are average or under weight, that's a bit more

positive isn't it?

Posted By: lovely old job on November 15th 2007 at 13:25:39

Message Thread

1 in 4 of our children are overweight, what if you only have 3 children like me? (n/m) (General Chat) - lovely old job, Nov 15, 13:21:27
- Yeah but the disadvantage of not being overweight is (General Chat) - CB41, Nov 15, 13:27:58
- ... (General Chat) - CB41, Nov 15, 13:25:51
  - I saw that on the news last night. It's mammoth! (General Chat) - Garry Brooke, Nov 15, 13:27:54
    - Let it be a warning to you - stear clear of bread and (General Chat) - CB41, Nov 15, 13:29:32
      - Cat food tastes rank. (n/m) (General Chat) - Garry Brooke, Nov 15, 13:30:45
        
        It might taste rank but are you a ranker. (n/m) (General Chat) - lovely old job, Nov 15, 13:31:30
        
        Thanks. (General Chat) - Garry Brooke, Nov 15, 13:36:22
- well I have 1 and he isn't, so then that theory is bollocks ? (n/m) (General Chat) - colincanary, Nov 15, 13:23:28
  - why can't they say that 3 in 4 children are average or under weight, that's a bit more (General Chat) - lovely old job, Nov 15, 13:25:39
- Each one will have 1/4 of them that is overweight. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Nov 15, 13:22:41
- If I had 3 children like you, they'd all be overweight. (n/m) (General Chat) - malkybarkid, Nov 15, 13:22:18
  - lol (n/m) (General Chat) - lovely old job, Nov 15, 13:22:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.