Yep, but we want to be tight at the back as well, is their a formation that will unable .. - Wrath of the Barclay

Yep, but we want to be tight at the back as well, is their a formation that will unable ..

us to keep the attacking threat but then remain tight as a virgin at the back?

Posted By: The Baron on July 23rd 2005 at 13:18:39

Message Thread

Will we play 4-4-2 next year? Apparently, although i have....... (NCFC) - The Baron, Jul 23, 12:53:53
- He'll start with 4-3-3 for them 3 home games...maybe changing for palace (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 23, 13:26:58
  - How about this formation?....... (NCFC) - The Baron, Jul 23, 13:35:50
    - Hughes for Jarrett (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 23, 13:38:30
      - Why Hughes for Jarrett? you feel Hughes is more of a grafter? (n/m) (NCFC) - The Baron, Jul 23, 13:41:13
        
        a far better player... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 23, 15:36:08
    - We should definitely play something like that (NCFC) - Komodo, Jul 23, 13:37:18
- Doesnt matter being open at the back (NCFC) - coldplay, Jul 23, 13:10:30
  - Yep, but we want to be tight at the back as well, is their a formation that will unable .. (NCFC) - The Baron, Jul 23, 13:18:39
  - like we did against rotherham? (n/m) (NCFC) - Komodo, Jul 23, 13:11:46
    - One game? (NCFC) - d0mj4y, Jul 23, 13:12:36
      - that's a bit of a distorted view (NCFC) - Komodo, Jul 23, 13:16:16
        
        Yep, spot on. We struggled (and did'nt) beat the likes of WBA, Wham (n/m) (NCFC) - The Baron, Jul 23, 13:20:30
        
        All distorted by (NCFC) - Cannydc, Jul 23, 13:19:41
        
        as i said above (NCFC) - Komodo, Jul 23, 13:25:52
- Options depend on who is in form and playing (NCFC) - Cannydc, Jul 23, 13:08:36

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.