I'd prefer Chadwick to Croft

He can at least put a tackle in. Croft never achieves anything attacking-wise and can't tackle either. We've already got Hucks in midfield who can't tackle so we can't afford Croft too. I've seen enough games recently where we can't get the ball off Ipswich, and playing Croft + Hucks + 2 strikers is screaming for it to happen again (especially as one of the two 'proper' midfielders - Smith - is a pretty attacking one)

Posted By: mr carra on October 30th 2007 at 16:28:47

Message Thread

Team for Sunday... (NCFC) - loz, Oct 30, 16:19:33
- I take it you think Russell isn't up to it then? (NCFC) - Bertie Biggins, Oct 30, 16:40:09
- Murray for Shax and Croft for Chadwick (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 30, 16:29:31
  - Agweeeeeed (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 30, 16:31:31
- Same, except for Croft instead of Chadwick... (NCFC) - Brom, Oct 30, 16:25:22
  - I'd prefer Chadwick to Croft (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 30, 16:28:47
    - Insanity. Chadwick is facking useless, clueless, lightweight , rubbish. IMHO. (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Oct 30, 16:45:18
    - Croft was our best player Saturday... (NCFC) - Brom, Oct 30, 16:30:29
      - people often say that about Croft.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 30, 16:34:04
        
        He was the only one making any effort... (NCFC) - Brom, Oct 30, 16:35:53
        
        I agree he makes a lot of effort (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 30, 16:37:44
        
        It is good to have someone in the team who looks like he gives a shit and gets the ball (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 30, 16:46:12
      - I like Buzz (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 30, 16:32:24

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.