on what basis?
that he was a well-known footballer?
I'd rather have Pulis - at least he has proved he can manage.
Posted By: mr carra on October 24th 2007 at 13:37:42
Message Thread
- Would Staunton be a good decision or not? I think he would (n/m) (NCFC) - Kevin Drinkell God, Oct 24, 13:33:38
- not (n/m) (NCFC) - Half Pint, Oct 24, 13:47:33
- Why? His appalling record with Ireland in his one and only job? (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 24, 13:43:42
- on what basis? (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 24, 13:37:42
- Mark Hughes? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 24, 13:54:41
- Hughes has some success with Wales. Staunton has had no success with EIRE (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 24, 13:56:36
- Yes but he hadn't when he was appointed. I was just pointing (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 24, 13:59:04
- Hughes has some success with Wales. Staunton has had no success with EIRE (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 24, 13:56:36
- Mark Hughes? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 24, 13:54:41
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.