Are they still giving the "turnout" percentage?

I read elsewhere, from a renowned halfwit and bigot no less (but that doesn't mean he's wrong in this instance), that they are not.

That would resemble a bit of a climb-down, wouldn't it? I've often seen the board bigging themselves up on thier transparancy on attendance figures, when compared to other clubs.

Posted By: Arizona Bay on October 23rd 2007 at 10:20:39

Message Thread

Dublins Supposed Coaching Role...Hmmm? (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Oct 23, 09:37:50
- Confused by fans (NCFC) - trt354, Oct 23, 10:11:15
- But Duffy requested that he be there, not the board (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 23, 10:08:58
- I thought exactly the same thing. How can the crowd turn on us if we appoint a fans (NCFC) - lovely old job, Oct 23, 09:55:34
  - Surely they're not that stupid (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 23, 10:06:38
    - Are they still giving the "turnout" percentage? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 23, 10:20:39
      - No, they're not over the tannoy (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 23, 10:27:50
        
        ROFL! LOL! I blame DOOMcaster!!! (NCFC) - Comrade Canary, Oct 23, 10:31:01
      - No longer over the tannoy but still in the programme (NCFC) - The King of Prussia, Oct 23, 10:22:16
    - The real figure is still in the programme (NCFC) - The King of Prussia, Oct 23, 10:19:40
      - Maybe that's why we signed Hartson (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 23, 10:32:19
    - I think the Board think we are stupet though. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Oct 23, 10:10:03
      - and in most cases, they're right (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 23, 10:23:48

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.