read my post again and show me where i said it was acceptable?

or where i said that the way we have been playing is acceptable?

i think an awful goal difference would be the -11 or -12 (iirc) that Sheff Wed and QPR have below us, not the -6 that we actually have

and again notice the part of my post where i said considering we are in the bottom 3 and then repeated the sentiment at the end, just to make it absolutely clear to even the numpiest of numpties exactly what i was saying

Posted By: blindasabat on October 18th 2007 at 10:49:51

Message Thread

Two wins in the next two games...... (NCFC) - Highlander, Oct 18, 09:54:30
- 2 wins and we hire a manager who relegates every club he manages (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 18, 10:18:13
  - Some people were hoping we'd do that the last couple of games... (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Oct 18, 10:20:19
    - i want us the win every game we play regardless of what happens! (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 18, 10:26:54
      - the more mail he gets saying No to Duffy the better n/m (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 18, 10:28:59
      - He is in the job for 2 games at least, so they must be considering this plonker (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 18, 10:28:33
        
        The fact he has 2 games means fuck all to me... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 18, 10:32:25
        
        not many manage 3 in 3. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 18, 10:42:34
        
        it was Chris Hutchings' (Jewell's replacement) signings that did for Bradford (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 18, 10:39:59
  - *yawn* (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 18, 10:19:31
    - |When they hire him mate - as will probably happen if we win our next two games (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 18, 10:20:41
      - then after that and after that and after that (NCFC) - pants, Oct 18, 10:37:13
      - I'm prepared to eat my hat on this but... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 18, 10:24:07
        
        If we hire the wrong person, you'll be munching (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Oct 18, 10:28:13
        
        considering we're in the bottom 3 i don't think our goal difference is awful at all (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 18, 10:37:27
        
        cos we are playing so defensive (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 18, 10:41:54
        
        read my post again and show me where i said it was acceptable? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 18, 10:49:51
        
        of course we can be relegated. i just dont think we will be :) (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 18, 10:33:24
        
        As for - We will not get relegated (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 18, 10:27:53
        
        It was widely regarded at the start oif the season... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 18, 10:35:00
        
        no he relegated Dundee first season (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 18, 10:25:58
        
        Paul jewell has 2 relegations to his name i am counting wednesday as he fucked them over (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 18, 10:29:36
        
        no he doesnt (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 18, 10:43:57
- surely 2 wins cant justify appointing Mr 3 relegations?? n/m (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 18, 09:58:07
  - You know how their minds work! (n/m) (n/m) (NCFC) - Highlander, Oct 18, 10:11:37
    - well however their minds work (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 18, 10:19:44
    - No. No we don't (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 18, 10:17:58

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.