did we really spend a million on Marshall?

The accounts state that we spent 2.2 million on Marshall, Cureton, Striker & Russell.

We know that Russell was 400k
If Marshall was really 1 million that means that Striker & Cureton cost only 800k in total

More likely Marshall & Striker were both 700k (1m EU for Striker doesn't seem impossible) and Cureton was (only) 400k.

However you look at it the commonly-accepted prices for Cureton (600k), Marshall (1m) and Striker (800k) have to be wrong.

Posted By: east of hampstead on October 16th 2007 at 12:54:22

Message Thread

Goalkeeping Situation (NCFC) - SuperDan, Oct 16, 10:31:14
- did we really spend a million on Marshall? (NCFC) - east of hampstead, Oct 16, 12:54:22
- To criticise the signing of Marshall is frankly mad.. (NCFC) - Wiltshire Yellow, Oct 16, 10:37:03
  - We'd be forced to sell Marshall, this is what I fear. (n/m) (NCFC) - francesco, Oct 16, 10:39:35
    - He is the only really 'saleable asset' we have at the moment.. (NCFC) - Wiltshire Yellow, Oct 16, 10:41:40
      - at the moment i'd agree, but who honestly thought, at this time last season (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 16, 10:43:43
    - We will be forced... (n/m) (NCFC) - francesco, Oct 16, 10:40:06
- If we get stuck in mid-table mediocrity, we'll sell Marshall in a couple of year (n/m) (NCFC) - francesco, Oct 16, 10:34:30
  - I agrre with Phrankin, Gallacher is a disaster! (n/m) (NCFC) - francesco, Oct 16, 10:35:35
    - *agree* (n/m) (NCFC) - francesco, Oct 16, 10:35:58
- Gallacher is appalling... (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 16, 10:33:55
  - Name one then! (NCFC) - SuperDan, Oct 16, 11:39:00
    - was it against Luton (NCFC) - raretek, Oct 16, 12:53:25
      - I knew that was gonna be mentioned! (NCFC) - SuperDan, Oct 16, 13:13:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.