maybe he's hoping every Tom, Dick or bigfeller, upon recieving their replies
will use their enhanced knowledge said replies provide, to email him with constructive and comprehensive suggestions of what strategy he could now employ
Posted By: blindasabat on October 4th 2007 at 18:13:00
Message Thread
- Doncaster's reply to my email (warning: lengthy) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 17:35:11
- In respect of Question 3 (NCFC) - The King of Prussia, Oct 4, 19:12:57
- I'm a bit concerned (NCFC) - Tomblander, Oct 4, 18:04:37
- maybe he's hoping every Tom, Dick or bigfeller, upon recieving their replies (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 4, 18:13:00
- Ah - but that's what I'll do when I ring him tomorrow! ;-) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 18:15:25
- Two things (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 18:09:58
- but it takes ages to read the thing in the first place (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 4, 18:12:25
- Took me less than 10 seconds. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Oct 4, 19:26:03
- are you a super fast reader? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 4, 20:17:56
- Yes, tudders, but he meant if you read the message, not just the subject (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 4, 19:28:24
- Took me less than 10 seconds. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Oct 4, 19:26:03
- but it takes ages to read the thing in the first place (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 4, 18:12:25
- agree ffs (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 4, 18:09:13
- It's up to him whether to reply or not (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 18:13:54
- ofcourse you do (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 4, 18:16:59
- It's up to him whether to reply or not (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 18:13:54
- maybe he's hoping every Tom, Dick or bigfeller, upon recieving their replies (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 4, 18:13:00
- Couple of thoughts (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 4, 17:50:24
- just on point 6... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 4, 17:48:37
- Didn't expect him to say anything - just wanted to register my opinion with him, s'all (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 17:52:42
- To which? Q6, or the whole email? (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 17:57:50
- Q6 (and alright slagging off might not be the right expression) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 4, 18:08:26
- Who knows? It's more that, as I said, nothing positive was said about Grant (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 18:11:48
- you mean the dreaded vote of confidence? :-) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 4, 18:18:16
- No. I'd be too relieved that the board had finally acted (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 18:21:47
- well maybe Grant was offered it for the transfer window (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 4, 18:26:09
- Not the sort of amount ND was suggesting we had only a couple of months ago (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 18:28:32
- well maybe Grant was offered it for the transfer window (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 4, 18:26:09
- No. I'd be too relieved that the board had finally acted (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 18:21:47
- you mean the dreaded vote of confidence? :-) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 4, 18:18:16
- Who knows? It's more that, as I said, nothing positive was said about Grant (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 18:11:48
- Q6 (and alright slagging off might not be the right expression) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 4, 18:08:26
- bit unfair to slag him off for his answer then intut? (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 4, 17:54:44
- To which? Q6, or the whole email? (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 17:57:50
- Didn't expect him to say anything - just wanted to register my opinion with him, s'all (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 17:52:42
- By the way, where I said his answer to Q2 was pie in the sky... (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 4, 17:48:28
- Hucks, Leon and Svensson... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 4, 19:21:50
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.