Who is managing this fecking team?
Grant lets Doc talk him into playing him when surely all the evidence suggested he should not have played. We are light enough for central defenders without taking the chance of aggravating an injury to your most experienced central defender. This for me is another example of Grants suspect decision making.
Posted By: trevor hockeys beard on October 3rd 2007 at 18:58:04
Message Thread
- Who is managing this fecking team? (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Oct 3, 18:58:04
- who would you have played CB? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 3, 19:00:58
- Dion. We still have 3 or 4 options up front. (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Oct 3, 19:04:53
- ok (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 3, 19:05:59
- Martin hasn't really had much of a chance yet. (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Oct 3, 19:10:50
- ok (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 3, 19:05:59
- Dion. We still have 3 or 4 options up front. (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Oct 3, 19:04:53
- you can prove anything with facts (NCFC) - Tomblander, Oct 3, 19:00:35
- pmsl (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 3, 19:08:03
- and here's who I nicked it from (NCFC) - pants, Oct 3, 19:08:46
- You obviously didn't realise I was joking when I posted that (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 3, 19:04:04
- pmsl (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 3, 19:08:03
- who would you have played CB? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 3, 19:00:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.