This is why pants really annoys people

because in any discussion he stubbornly refuses to see the other point of view - refuses to even believe that there is any point of view other than his own.

Posted By: duke of york on October 1st 2007 at 11:35:21

Message Thread

FAO the board (NCFC) - ramsgatecabbie, Oct 1, 11:08:30
- Haven't they got some squillionaire crook from Formula 1 to bankroll them though? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 1, 11:12:14
  - more to do they are shit and bottom than being bankrolled (n/m) (NCFC) - ramsgatecabbie, Oct 1, 11:19:00
    - But they can afford it (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 1, 11:21:57
      - Have they been taken over now? Lucky them if they have (NCFC) - pants, Oct 1, 11:31:14
      - Agree on the rich/ruthless bit (NCFC) - ramsgatecabbie, Oct 1, 11:31:07
  - the qpr model, change managers and chairman as much as possible and (NCFC) - pants, Oct 1, 11:17:31
    - not to mention fights in games, gun point seiges, administration?....... (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 1, 11:21:20
      - We don't look too good at the moment though Gus, do we? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 1, 11:24:08
        
        This is why pants really annoys people (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 1, 11:35:21
        
        I don't think that's altogether true, I do read and take things on board (NCFC) - pants, Oct 1, 12:31:52
        
        That's hardly unique on here. (n/m) (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Oct 1, 11:38:19
        
        No, but some are mere amateurs by comparison (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 1, 11:39:45
  - yes (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 1, 11:16:14

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.