hucks was right. worst team for years.

worst team since hamilton era. is it grants fault? on paper we have a strong squad but they are just not performing. i think maybe grant should be given a chance. maybe 3 or 4 more games. if still the same then he must go. he did well at west ham as coach. we are still only 10 points off leaders. if we are in this position at xmas then i would be happy to be 10 points behind leaders. anyone who thinks we are going back to the premiership is dillusional

Posted By: Kevin Drinkell God on September 30th 2007 at 13:20:52

Message Thread

Hucks an asset or a disruption? (NCFC) - ingi, Sep 30, 13:09:58
- hucks was right. worst team for years. (NCFC) - Kevin Drinkell God, Sep 30, 13:20:52
  - yes he is right, but you dont say it! how does that help?! it dont! (n/m) (NCFC) - ingi, Sep 30, 13:24:01
- he's an asset but i dont believe he's properly fit, or has been this season. (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Sep 30, 13:15:57
- Surely an asset, someone who tells the truth? (NCFC) - Army Boy, Sep 30, 13:15:01
  - not his job. (NCFC) - megson, Sep 30, 15:36:39
  - thing is, we weren't that bad until Hucks came back from injury (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 30, 14:06:10
- asset, it is the worst team in years, having hucks is a boost, even though he hasnt been (NCFC) - lmc, Sep 30, 13:14:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.