I'm not entirely sure what you mean
but whatever the problem is it doesn't seem to me that it goes back quite that far back- but it seems to have arisen around about the time of Rioch and Hamilton and Costa del Colney.
One thing is that we have never seemed as fit as other teams - even in the play-off and promotion seasons we seldom played for 90 minutes. The thing today was that Wolves were simply so much quicker than us.
And I actually don't remember any other team coming up against us and offering as little as we did today, and as we have done on a lot of occasions over the past two and a bit years. Even when we thrashed Walsall and Barnsley they at least offered something going forward - the sum total of our attacking today was one shot from Martin that didn't even go for a goal kick.
It seemed to me that Grant came in with a good knowledge of us, and with a plan to sort out the problems. I don't criticise any signing he has made, or criticise his tactics (apart from mistakes like dropping Brown today - but there was nothing wrong with the formation) but all that he has done has not worked.
Posted By: Blind Lemon Creosote on September 23rd 2007 at 01:08:30
Message Thread
- Yesterday and last week signalled the very same values that made this club (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:21:01
- I agree with you pal... here's why (NCFC) - ronnie, Sep 23, 01:07:17
- oh, can you bang on the pipes on f wing now, so we can agree with each other (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:09:53
- it wouldnt surprsie me at all if we went on a good run of home results. (NCFC) - ronnie, Sep 23, 01:19:02
- you obviously don't visit carra road often (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 23, 05:19:43
- it wouldnt surprsie me at all if we went on a good run of home results. (NCFC) - ronnie, Sep 23, 01:19:02
- oh, can you bang on the pipes on f wing now, so we can agree with each other (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:09:53
- There is only one conclusion we can draw from this post (NCFC) - BillySteele, Sep 23, 00:56:57
- Nope - you've completely lost me: stick to 'spacker schools' (n/m) (NCFC) - The Judge, Sep 23, 00:34:04
- I don't expect anyone to reply good (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:37:28
- Sorry: I'm going to 'reply bad' (NCFC) - The Judge, Sep 23, 00:40:23
- Again, I think that's the point, no one really knows he is that bad (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:57:12
- So oh wise one (NCFC) - Blind Lemon Creosote, Sep 23, 00:39:46
- That's the point isn't it? but since relegation from 95 (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:52:56
- I'm not entirely sure what you mean (NCFC) - Blind Lemon Creosote, Sep 23, 01:08:30
- It means (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:21:02
- In the limited sense (NCFC) - Blind Lemon Creosote, Sep 23, 01:44:24
- So you're saying the fans think it's someone else's fault? (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 01:26:20
- I know you've got all night, but raise the bar a tad please (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:27:49
- It means (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:21:02
- Run that again? (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 00:55:23
- I'm not entirely sure what you mean (NCFC) - Blind Lemon Creosote, Sep 23, 01:08:30
- That's the point isn't it? but since relegation from 95 (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:52:56
- Sorry: I'm going to 'reply bad' (NCFC) - The Judge, Sep 23, 00:40:23
- I don't expect anyone to reply good (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:37:28
- Fuck off Himsworth. (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 00:33:03
- Well it's how I feel (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:35:23
- Ouch, that really hurt. See, I always thought you kinda liked me. (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 00:41:18
- quality, the betting reference above, and your daily "oh it's 5 o'clock, don't know (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:54:45
- Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance. (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 00:58:53
- Is it? And you forward that view when you reply to me? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:03:56
- Don't. (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 01:07:41
- rofl (n/m) (NCFC) - The Judge, Sep 23, 01:22:18
- You laugh at the arrogance of that post, yet I've spent the last 4 weeks working (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:24:24
- So, you've just got in from work, (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 01:31:08
- one straw clutches to another (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:31:55
- Which of course, makes perfect sense. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 01:34:27
- You've changed the subject to suit your next argument (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:38:46
- These straws are clutching each other like nobody's business (n/m) (NCFC) - The Judge, Sep 23, 01:40:21
- You've changed the subject to suit your next argument (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:38:46
- Which of course, makes perfect sense. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 01:34:27
- one straw clutches to another (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:31:55
- So, you've just got in from work, (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 01:31:08
- You laugh at the arrogance of that post, yet I've spent the last 4 weeks working (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:24:24
- I know you have (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:08:29
- rofl (n/m) (NCFC) - The Judge, Sep 23, 01:22:18
- Don't. (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 01:07:41
- Is it? And you forward that view when you reply to me? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:03:56
- Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance. (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 00:58:53
- quality, the betting reference above, and your daily "oh it's 5 o'clock, don't know (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:54:45
- He's throwing haymakers now and he doesn't care who he takes down (NCFC) - The Judge, Sep 23, 00:36:48
- eh? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:43:19
- "cowardly tagging on"? (NCFC) - The Judge, Sep 23, 01:01:18
- we've both achieved our aims (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:14:20
- Your point is lost in a drunken fug, my point is that your point is lost in a drunken fug (n/m) (NCFC) - The Judge, Sep 23, 01:21:53
- we've both achieved our aims (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 01:14:20
- Serotonin levels a bit low? (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 00:45:49
- I may as reply the same post to judge to you (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:59:20
- You could. Hopefully it might make some sense. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 01:02:09
- I may as reply the same post to judge to you (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:59:20
- "cowardly tagging on"? (NCFC) - The Judge, Sep 23, 01:01:18
- eh? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:43:19
- Ouch, that really hurt. See, I always thought you kinda liked me. (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 23, 00:41:18
- Well it's how I feel (NCFC) - pants, Sep 23, 00:35:23
- Hmmm (NCFC) - Blind Lemon Creosote, Sep 23, 00:31:13
- I agree with you pal... here's why (NCFC) - ronnie, Sep 23, 01:07:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.