no. cos WW2 etc that refers to old NEWS

whereas this was an opinion which I'd already stated and he was just agreeing with. (without realising it, obviously, given the dook's fondness for a row rather agreement.)

therefore more worthy of a QUACK.

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on May 9th 2005 at 11:54:35

Message Thread

Don't mean to worry you guys further (NCFC) - Capital Canary, May 9, 11:34:03
- IF (NCFC) - Komodo, May 9, 11:37:35
  - You think that? (NCFC) - GregP, May 9, 11:42:22
    - He's said ?10m-?25m, actually. (n/m) (NCFC) - d0mj4y, May 9, 11:43:26
      - I heard (NCFC) - Capital Canary, May 9, 11:53:10
  - Saints could have said that last season (NCFC) - mr carra, May 9, 11:40:50
    - but they cocked it up managerially (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, May 9, 11:43:01
      - quack. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 9, 11:44:04
        
        I see no QUACK! (NCFC) - BeverlyHills0201, May 9, 11:46:32
        
        well depends on your definition of QUACK (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 9, 11:48:13
        
        Is that not more of a WW2 starts? (NCFC) - BeverlyHills0201, May 9, 11:51:41
        
        no. cos WW2 etc that refers to old NEWS (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 9, 11:54:35
        
        We need a new term then...... (NCFC) - BeverlyHills0201, May 9, 12:01:59
    - yep. their problem was the wrong manager, I guess. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 9, 11:42:10

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.