Ok
(a) Disappointing so far but needs time to settle in and get used to the pace of the game. Only a couple of sub appearances for the first team.
(b) No. But has been obviously unfit. Looked better on saturday and will hopefully keep improving.
(c) No - looks class when given the service. Unfortunately that has only happened in 2 games when he responded with 4 goals.
(d) Yes - leads the line well but never looks like scoring which is becominga problem. Better player than given credit for last season though.
(e) Yes - looks good and has been our best midfielder but passing is not great and seems we lack creativity with him alongside Brellier.
(f) God knows - because we have no other centre backs. Looked better on saturday alongside DD.
(g) Has been playing CF but played CB on saturday because Shack was injured.
Posted By: Jim on September 4th 2007 at 11:22:49
Message Thread
- So before I disappear again to tackle the backlog, could someone please summarise (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:18:06
- Okeydokey (without reading anyone elses answers: (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Sep 4, 11:36:11
- ok (NCFC) - blindasabat, Sep 4, 11:31:40
- suggest you ask on a day when the board isn't populated (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 4, 11:28:53
- But it's the usual suspects (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:33:19
- I'm not miserable. Take that back. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Sep 4, 11:30:59
- the most miserable crew ever assembled apart from (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 4, 11:32:09
- Cool (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 4, 11:25:41
- Hare gew (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 4, 11:23:30
- Thanks (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:28:49
- Git, be positive - think of the what you would have asked this time last season... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 4, 11:33:58
- Excellent, well done (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:36:31
- He looks like he's been on the salads lately (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 4, 11:38:12
- Excellent, well done (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:36:31
- Git, be positive - think of the what you would have asked this time last season... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 4, 11:33:58
- Thanks (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:28:49
- Ok (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 4, 11:22:49
- Thanks. Re (c), who was supplying the service in those two games (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:26:21
- we had good service down the wings in those games (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 4, 11:30:48
- 4-3-3, 4-ficking-3-3 (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:35:12
- problem was against cardiff (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 4, 11:54:17
- Well if Brellier does become the fiery DM we hoped he would, we would (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 4, 11:39:32
- 4-3-3, 4-ficking-3-3 (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:35:12
- Croft and Semi.. Why not recently ? We used 4-3-3 and one possibility is (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 4, 11:28:44
- we had good service down the wings in those games (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 4, 11:30:48
- Thanks. Re (c), who was supplying the service in those two games (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:26:21
- "tackle the backlog". I like that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 4, 11:20:41
- answers (NCFC) - lurd, Sep 4, 11:20:26
- TVM. (a) and (b) particularly depressing (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 4, 11:23:02
- God, the answers to some of those questions will send phrankin into raptures... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Sep 4, 11:19:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.