The reason why signing on fees were not included is because - Wrath of the Barclay

The reason why signing on fees were not included is because

they are paid through the length of the players contract and I therefore treated them as part of the wagebill as that is how they get paid.

Posted By: Commisar_Canary on August 31st 2007 at 14:13:16

Message Thread

Time is running out... (NCFC) - Ricochet Rabbit, Aug 30, 15:50:34
- more chance of getting blood from a stone than NCFC spending big money on a quality CB (n/m) (NCFC) - Commisar_Canary, Aug 30, 16:13:55
  - That's because we don't have big money... (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Aug 30, 16:18:57
    - where's the balance of the transfer money ? (NCFC) - Commisar_Canary, Aug 30, 16:42:53
      - down the back of the sofa (NCFC) - megson, Aug 30, 16:53:54
      - and have you taken into account the signing on fees for the "free transfers"? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Aug 30, 16:47:33
        
        The reason why signing on fees were not included is because (NCFC) - Commisar_Canary, Aug 31, 14:13:16
        
        and our excessive wage bill 9.3 million a year (n/m) (NCFC) - Fuel_rox, Aug 30, 16:51:02
      - Bristol (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Aug 30, 16:45:56
        
        ha ha (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 30, 16:46:38
    - cause we do (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Aug 30, 16:28:11
- Tut (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 30, 16:03:55
  - check this out..... (NCFC) - Ricochet Rabbit, Aug 30, 16:07:57
    - Better (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 30, 16:10:02
- Looks like we might need 2! (n/m) (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Aug 30, 15:54:48

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.