diverting slightly..

but even given the dearth of available talent, surely given our relative recent success and 'favourite' position, we should have been first choice for the likes of ward, ifill, etc..

Posted By: camcan on July 18th 2005 at 11:47:19

Message Thread

Who has really been strengthening their squads? (NCFC) - Burge, Jul 18, 11:21:33
- don't really care about others (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 18, 11:30:39
- I'd say Leeds, Palace, Sheff Utd, Wolves and PNE have all strengthed better than us... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 18, 11:29:28
  - Irrelevant (NCFC) - Ashton4England, Jul 18, 12:36:39
    - 17 Players. (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 18, 12:37:39
      - Percentage wise, how confident are you that 17 is the right number? (n/m) (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Jul 18, 12:38:42
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 18, 12:51:06
        
        I'm 90% certain that 17 players isn't enough. (n/m) (NCFC) - roywallerslovechild, Jul 18, 12:47:20
  - I'm not sure that all of those have... (NCFC) - Delveg, Jul 18, 11:34:22
    - Come on Palace's signings piss all over ours. (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 18, 11:41:52
      - diverting slightly.. (NCFC) - camcan, Jul 18, 11:47:19
        
        Ifill and Ward would have been good signings... (NCFC) - Delveg, Jul 18, 11:50:01
      - Don't agree (NCFC) - HarryHelveg, Jul 18, 11:46:45
      - I agree, but they have lost two... (NCFC) - Delveg, Jul 18, 11:43:45
        
        haven't we also lost 2 good (if not great) players in Bentley & Helveg? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 18, 11:52:39
        
        Arguably yes, although i'm not sure... (NCFC) - Delveg, Jul 18, 11:56:35
        
        I don't think Palace's signings 'piss' all over ours (NCFC) - Burge, Jul 18, 11:52:34
  - Disagree - Which of their new players are better than our existing? (NCFC) - Burge, Jul 18, 11:32:47
    - bigger and better squads (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 18, 11:41:33
- Out of that list..... (NCFC) - BeverlyHills0201, Jul 18, 11:27:47
  - And which of the players they have signed would improve us? (NCFC) - Burge, Jul 18, 11:30:41
    - so why haven't we signed them? (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jul 18, 11:32:04
    - I answered your question. Which sides have strengthened. (n/m) (NCFC) - BeverlyHills0201, Jul 18, 11:32:01
- Good post! :-) (n/m) (NCFC) - pieman63, Jul 18, 11:25:54
- Nothing too much to worry about imo (NCFC) - Burge, Jul 18, 11:23:19
  - Maybe the following might have been useful (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 18, 11:31:19
    - You really don't have a clue (NCFC) - Burge, Jul 18, 11:35:39
    - 6 of whom are 33+. (NCFC) - Arganth, Jul 18, 11:34:13
      - Yeah well that list would change pending new signings but if (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 18, 11:37:48
      - Doesn't he have bad-apple status? (n/m) (NCFC) - roywallerslovechild, Jul 18, 11:36:47
        
        So does Koumas, but there are idiots on here almost suicidal that we've haven't signed him (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Jul 18, 11:39:29
        
        Oh great Wrathing...somebody disagrees everything is rosy... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 18, 11:54:24
        
        I thought Koumas was more "lazy-bastard" than "bad-apple"? (n/m) (NCFC) - roywallerslovechild, Jul 18, 11:41:38
        
        He hasn't bothered to report for... (NCFC) - Delveg, Jul 18, 11:46:38
        
        staggering.. (NCFC) - camcan, Jul 18, 11:41:14
        
        I think that's a reaction to us not buying anyone else more than anything (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 18, 11:40:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.