No other options though, were there?

Only possibility was Hucks. But don't think he would have wanted it, or it would have suited him. Seems he likes being a bit of an outsider - able to say what he thinks etc.

Who else could he have chosen?

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on August 15th 2007 at 10:27:12

Message Thread

Chris Brown (NCFC) - Burge, Aug 15, 10:17:29
- Maybe we need to stick with Shacks and the Doc for now (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 15, 10:19:42
  - main problem is in their case the whole (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 15, 10:32:32
  - any injury to either of those is a worry (NCFC) - raretek, Aug 15, 10:23:02
    - yep, agree. We need cover. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 15, 10:24:34
  - They had last season. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tim Westwood, Aug 15, 10:21:07
    - not saying theyre necessarily getting better (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 15, 10:24:08
      - True, I actually think making Shack skipper is a mistake (NCFC) - Tim Westwood, Aug 15, 10:25:53
        
        No other options though, were there? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 15, 10:27:12
        
        Cureton, he'd have loved it (NCFC) - blindasabat, Aug 15, 10:33:08
        
        I guess not - what a sad state of affairs! (NCFC) - Tim Westwood, Aug 15, 10:30:13
        
        i agree but (NCFC) - BoundsGreen, Aug 15, 10:27:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.