Langham guilty of child porn, not guilty of indecent assault
So that's alright, then...no...hang on...
Posted By: Partial Angler on August 2nd 2007 at 16:27:11
Message Thread
- Langham guilty of child porn, not guilty of indecent assault (General Chat) - Partial Angler, Aug 2, 16:27:11
- What does that mean then? (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 2, 16:27:55
- He never shagged that girl when she was 14. (General Chat) - Partial Angler, Aug 2, 16:30:25
- does that include the charge of buggery? (n/m) (General Chat) - blindasabat, Aug 2, 16:40:34
- lol notice hoe they quickly stopped mentioning that. (n/m) (General Chat) - megson, Aug 3, 08:45:57
- does that include the charge of buggery? (n/m) (General Chat) - blindasabat, Aug 2, 16:40:34
- It means he's a cunt (n/m) (General Chat) - LittleMouseWithClogs, Aug 2, 16:28:49
- lol (n/m) (General Chat) - lovely old job, Aug 2, 16:29:11
- He never shagged that girl when she was 14. (General Chat) - Partial Angler, Aug 2, 16:30:25
- What does that mean then? (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 2, 16:27:55
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.