What was the standard of the opposition, btw?

Posted By: Arizona Bay on July 23rd 2007 at 12:49:13

Message Thread

What I don't understand about Grant's tactics on Saturday is that, (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 12:46:24
- isn't the value of a practice game to practice things like new systems? (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 23, 12:51:40
  - Yeah, but I'd have thought they would have at least done it in training a few (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 12:53:04
    - Obviously they concoct newfangled schemes to try out in practice games (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 23, 12:54:23
      - Only reason I can think of for doing it without a few practices on it would be (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 12:55:47
      - 1-2-1-5-1 (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jul 23, 12:55:39
        
        Actually it wasn't much different to that as it turned out! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 12:56:19
        
        in reverse, presumably? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 23, 13:00:41
        
        No (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 13:03:41
- What was the standard of the opposition, btw? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jul 23, 12:49:13
  - Not great... (NCFC) - Declan, Jul 23, 12:51:35
    - and two years before then were still amateur (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 12:53:59
  - Utter shite (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 12:51:16
    - League two? Conference? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jul 23, 12:51:48
      - Tampax (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 12:53:35
        
        Royal Family? (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jul 23, 12:54:30
  - 9 (n/m) (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jul 23, 12:49:37

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.