I would define it thus:

using the power of expression in the language of English in the written form. Communicating it effectively so that it is both understood and accepted.

Posted By: Tomblander on July 23rd 2007 at 10:55:27

Message Thread

FAO Canary fans on tour (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 10:03:23
- Sorry if we spoiled your cup final (NCFC) - Marigold, Jul 23, 10:24:18
- FAO Steve in Holland... (NCFC) - beckford, Jul 23, 10:06:48
  - And why wouldn't I ?!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 10:09:03
- FAO: Steve in Holland... (NCFC) - Declan, Jul 23, 10:05:27
  - blubtastic! (NCFC) - megson, Jul 23, 10:07:28
    - Yeah (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 10:08:52
      - calling your own fans cunts.. (NCFC) - beckford, Jul 23, 10:32:38
        
        jesus h christ (NCFC) - megson, Jul 23, 10:37:29
        
        ffs (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 10:43:15
        
        that's a lot of beer! (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Jul 23, 11:01:20
        
        Saves making four trips to the bar... (NCFC) - Declan, Jul 23, 10:46:53
        
        hmmmm (NCFC) - megson, Jul 23, 11:04:16
        
        I don't think they were Steve's own fans, I think they were there for NCFC, not Steve. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jul 23, 10:37:21
        
        yeah (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 10:42:58
        
        5 beers each intut (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 10:44:12
        
        doubt tit (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 10:45:35
        
        No pint glasses, hence the massive orders! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 10:47:06
        
        it was de rigeur in germany (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 10:49:05
        
        Not during ?! (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 10:50:12
        
        Our goalie did (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 10:51:07
        
        Surely it would have been von das rigour? (n/m) (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jul 23, 10:50:09
        
        Kirk to bridge (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 10:52:07
        
        Yes, but what, precisely, do you mean by "pedant"? How would you define it, exactly? (n/m) (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jul 23, 10:53:29
        
        I would define it thus: (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 10:55:27
        
        Whereas I would define it thus: (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jul 23, 10:58:00
        
        or, briefly (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 11:00:34
        
        lokl (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 10:41:49
        
        lol (NCFC) - megson, Jul 23, 10:40:16
        
        you know what I meant (NCFC) - beckford, Jul 23, 10:39:02
        
        Look at some porn (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jul 23, 10:44:53
        
        unless his mother pops up in one of the films being taken up the wrong 'un by Ben Dover (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 23, 10:46:55
        
        what are the chances of that happening twice though blinders? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 10:53:10
        
        depends on if you deliberately choose to watch the same film Tomby (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 23, 10:56:12
        
        well, then it wouldn't be by chance then would it blinders? It'd be a deliberate choice.. (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 10:58:56
        
        in which case you should probably be quite safe Tomby (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 23, 11:13:50
        
        Pedant (n/m) (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jul 23, 10:59:34
        
        pedantist (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 11:01:11
        
        pedalo (n/m) (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jul 23, 11:08:23
        
        pedagogue (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 23, 11:09:05
        
        Fair point, well made (n/m) (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jul 23, 10:48:08
        
        lighten up love (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 23, 10:40:15

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.