no everton couldn't have loaned him
but they could have bought him in Jan when the window opened. Which, as pointed out above, might explain his bargaining strength in getting the clause included.
Posted By: mr carra on July 17th 2007 at 10:39:56
Message Thread
- Dicson's release clause... (NCFC) - loz, Jul 17, 10:25:32
- rather suspect the deal was agreed before the loan spell (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 17, 10:29:44
- £450k x 2.5 = £1125k (n/m) (NCFC) - Commisar_Canary, Jul 17, 11:56:49
- £600k x 2.5 = £1.5m (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 17, 12:04:55
- He nearly went to Everton the start of the year.. (NCFC) - loz, Jul 17, 10:31:19
- and if you look carefully, you've just explained why he was able to get his release clause (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 17, 10:36:45
- but not enough to buy him (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 17, 10:32:30
- Fare enough but... (NCFC) - loz, Jul 17, 10:34:05
- no everton couldn't have loaned him (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 17, 10:39:56
- Fare enough but... (NCFC) - loz, Jul 17, 10:34:05
- Not enough to compete with us for his signature (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 17, 10:32:08
- £450k x 2.5 = £1125k (n/m) (NCFC) - Commisar_Canary, Jul 17, 11:56:49
- Deal was probably all agreed when loan sorted out (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jul 17, 10:27:27
- rather suspect the deal was agreed before the loan spell (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 17, 10:29:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.