i guess slightly inconsistent

would be inconsistently inconsistent as opposed to really inconsistent which is consistently inconsistent

or possibly the "really" wasn't necessary in my original post,

Posted By: blindasabat on July 16th 2007 at 17:31:00

Message Thread

I don't see how the fans can have a go at the board for accepting £1.5m (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 16, 17:15:32
- why grant him a release clause he was pants on loan.. (NCFC) - loz, Jul 16, 17:17:28
  - That might explain this expression (NCFC) - pants, Jul 16, 17:18:43
    - Has he got the words to "On The Ball City" on his wall? (NCFC) - Dog, Jul 16, 17:20:36
      - he does have a wecam though (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 16, 17:23:22
        
        Stalkers (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 16, 17:24:51
        
        eh? (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 16, 17:26:01
- fair point (NCFC) - pants, Jul 16, 17:17:27
  - unless he carries on being really inconsistant (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 16, 17:21:44
    - can you be slightly inconsistent? (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 16, 17:26:00
      - i guess slightly inconsistent (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 16, 17:31:00
        
        that has clarified that then (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 16, 17:34:36
        
        that's alright, DiF's cleared it all up (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 16, 17:36:24
        
        no he blummin hint (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 16, 17:42:34
        
        it was really unnecessary (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jul 16, 17:44:57
        
        stop it (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 16, 17:47:24
        
        no (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jul 16, 17:33:09

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.