I'm sure I remember Grant saying when he was appointed

That he was a great believer in an old-fashioned 4-4-2 with pace out wide. He's now got the players to do that and without Earnshaw it makes Hucks easier to fit into the team. That said, I also have a suspicion that, given the choice, he wants Hucks to play up front rather than on the wing. It can't be a co-incidence that we tightened up across the park with Hucks up front and an orthodox left winger in his place.

Posted By: Iwan Husarmi on July 11th 2007 at 21:23:27

Message Thread

I'd love to see us line-up like this next year: (NCFC) - Dog, Jul 11, 21:12:38
- I'd be happy with (NCFC) - Duck, Jul 11, 21:59:37
  - Who is this New? When did we sign him? (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Jul 11, 22:01:36
- Don't think that Dublin will be a first choice (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Jul 11, 21:26:46
- I'm sure I remember Grant saying when he was appointed (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jul 11, 21:23:27
  - Like I said... (NCFC) - Dog, Jul 11, 21:32:02
- chadwick for croft, surely (n/m) (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jul 11, 21:18:42
  - I was toying with that idea... (NCFC) - Dog, Jul 11, 21:19:45
- That would blatantly be the best Norwich line up in years. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Jul 11, 21:17:41
  - Although I don't know if Safri will still be here. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Jul 11, 21:18:44
    - I hope that he is. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, Jul 11, 21:20:11
      - Same here, though we won't see loads of him even if he is. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Jul 11, 21:26:37

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.