well, Grant won't have had a clue about his time at Norwich here before

we've signed him on the basis of what he did last season, I guess. Whereas signing Kenton would be based pretty much entirely on what he did here years ago, wouldn't it?

(Mind you, I wouldn't have spent much money on Cureton if I were PG.)

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on July 4th 2007 at 17:37:04

Message Thread

Well it has been a hell of a week (NCFC) - Riverking, Jul 4, 16:43:25
- long shot in terms of fitness but (NCFC) - pants, Jul 4, 16:57:13
  - Looking forwards, not back. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 4, 17:28:44
    - which catagory does Cureton fit into? (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 4, 17:34:04
      - well, Grant won't have had a clue about his time at Norwich here before (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 4, 17:37:04
        
        Grant might've been watching Kenton at Leicester (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 4, 17:44:23
        
        well if he has then he surely won't be signing him (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 4, 17:45:23
        
        as i haven't been watching him at Leicester (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 4, 17:51:34
  - I`d be happy with a return, he is transfer listed too. got lynched when i suggested it b4 (n/m) (NCFC) - Thomo, Jul 4, 17:21:53
    - The risk wouldn't hurt us that much (NCFC) - pants, Jul 4, 17:36:14
  - no tar (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Jul 4, 16:57:53
- davenport (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Jul 4, 16:54:36

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.