Shacks is OK alongside Dion
but the Doc is an absolute liability and Shacks play considerably worse alongside him.
Oh, and Shacks doesn't very often keep the ball on the pitch when he tries to pass the ball more than 10 yards.
Posted By: duke of york on June 30th 2007 at 12:02:56
Message Thread
- All this speculation about which forwards we are after (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Jun 30, 11:50:11
- WHAT???? (NCFC) - hucks_06, Jun 30, 11:56:17
- Shacks is OK alongside Dion (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 30, 12:02:56
- And Dion should not be a CB next season (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 30, 12:04:58
- And Dion "goes long" very effectively I hear (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 30, 12:05:54
- Ture we kneed a new CB but what about youngsters? (NCFC) - hucks_06, Jun 30, 12:08:10
- Reckon Spillane could be good enough (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 30, 12:09:16
- Yeh hes pretty solid (n/m) (NCFC) - hucks_06, Jun 30, 12:10:28
- Reckon Spillane could be good enough (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 30, 12:09:16
- Ture we kneed a new CB but what about youngsters? (NCFC) - hucks_06, Jun 30, 12:08:10
- And Dion "goes long" very effectively I hear (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 30, 12:05:54
- And Dion should not be a CB next season (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 30, 12:04:58
- We do need another CB though unless the Doc ups his game (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 30, 12:01:59
- Shacks is OK alongside Dion (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 30, 12:02:56
- WHAT???? (NCFC) - hucks_06, Jun 30, 11:56:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.