Yeah because
(1) top scorer of the Championship last season, don't think he will lose his form after 1 good season
(2) same as Hucks, had heart and love to play for this football club
(3) the price was better than Eastwood and Sharp. Sharp scored more goals than him but in League One, I saw many of Sharp's goal and he was definitely unmarked in many occasions.
Posted By: XXL16 on June 19th 2007 at 09:47:46
Message Thread
- Cureton. Yay or Nay? (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 19, 09:41:30
- Big gooey money-shot of nostalgia. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 19, 09:51:54
- all over daughters face (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 19, 10:12:08
- Not for anything more than 250k (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 19, 09:51:26
- Yay... (NCFC) - The Judge, Jun 19, 09:50:09
- If we'd signed him last season there would have been a LOT of moans (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 19, 09:51:50
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 19, 09:51:35
- Yeah because (NCFC) - XXL16, Jun 19, 09:47:46
- No. Bit too old for me (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Jun 19, 09:46:33
- Nay for £750k (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 19, 09:46:20
- Actually, with Eastwood and Sharp apparently not keen, then maybe we have no choice (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 19, 09:51:22
- are there only three strikers available then? (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 19, 09:56:56
- Peter Thorne is available. Good scoring record over his career. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 19, 09:59:28
- Name me another goalscoring striker that would be avaliable (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 19, 09:59:17
- I'm just trying to make the point (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 19, 10:05:56
- Yes, but I'm making the point that good, goalscoring strikers aren't widely avaliable (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 19, 10:10:43
- Yes. After all we have an impeccable recent record with older strikers who have (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 19, 10:19:22
- cant really compare the likes of Thorne to a striker still scoring lots of goals (NCFC) - nixon, Jun 19, 10:32:21
- Thorne was still scoring goals when we signed him (NCFC) - mr carra, Jun 19, 11:14:59
- cant really compare the likes of Thorne to a striker still scoring lots of goals (NCFC) - nixon, Jun 19, 10:32:21
- Yes. After all we have an impeccable recent record with older strikers who have (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 19, 10:19:22
- Yes, but I'm making the point that good, goalscoring strikers aren't widely avaliable (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 19, 10:10:43
- Peter Thorne (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 19, 09:59:55
- I'm just trying to make the point (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 19, 10:05:56
- are there only three strikers available then? (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 19, 09:56:56
- Actually, with Eastwood and Sharp apparently not keen, then maybe we have no choice (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 19, 09:51:22
- nay fw (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 19, 09:45:20
- what do you consider cheap? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jun 19, 09:43:40
- well no more than £500k (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 19, 09:47:39
- Nay (n/m) (NCFC) - Creosote Ah Um, Jun 19, 09:42:44
- Big gooey money-shot of nostalgia. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 19, 09:51:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.