no - Wrath of the Barclay

no

i actually agree with you on this one. there is a distinct semantic difference between the two lexemes and misuse can lead to confusion or (even worse) misunderstanding.

which is not the case with spelling.

(and yes i did just start a sentence with a relative pronoun)

(and again with 'and')

Posted By: Dave in France on May 17th 2007 at 12:39:02

Message Thread

Apparently the West Indian fielders are literally beating themselves up in the field (n/m) (General Chat) - Yellalee, May 17, 12:01:21
- thank goodness their not beating themselves off (n/m) (General Chat) - Tomblander, May 17, 12:10:43
  - Aye (n/m) (General Chat) - Tomblander, May 17, 12:20:31
  - AV!!!!!!!!!!!! (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, May 17, 12:19:45
    - Well spotted. (General Chat) - Dave in France, May 17, 12:22:55
      - Is the distinction between "their" and "they're" now in the category of etc etc? (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, May 17, 12:25:21
        
        no (General Chat) - Dave in France, May 17, 12:39:02
        
        oh (2) (General Chat) - Tomblander, May 17, 12:43:15
        
        agreed (General Chat) - Dave in France, May 17, 12:46:29
        
        shit (General Chat) - Dave in France, May 17, 12:43:10
        
        That's all very well but you appear to be somewhat selective in your piousness (n/m) (General Chat) - Tomblander, May 17, 12:27:30
        
        he only does it to people who should know better (n/m) (General Chat) - Dave in France, May 17, 12:39:39
        
        oh (General Chat) - Tomblander, May 17, 12:40:50
  - that leads to blindness that do (n/m) (General Chat) - blindasabat, May 17, 12:15:41

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.