Not necessarily

The proposed Howard deal was simply the acquisition of a player. The Cotterill / MacKenzie deal although it would have had roughly the same net transfer fee would also have seen us saving one player's wages.

Posted By: Creosote Ah Um on May 12th 2007 at 14:49:29

Message Thread

Good for you, Derby (Other Football) - Cannydc, May 12, 13:56:02
- Derby are a nasty cheating side - (Other Football) - KentonCanary, May 12, 14:48:59
  - No we aren't (Other Football) - CheatingcuntBywater, May 12, 14:51:30
    - lol (n/m) (Other Football) - bobble, May 12, 18:52:49
- after watching that game and seeing how well howard played... (Other Football) - Alan, May 12, 13:58:28
  - we could never have afforded him without selling earnshaw (n/m) (Other Football) - Dave in France, May 12, 14:09:08
    - eh? (Other Football) - Alan, May 12, 14:40:22
      - "We had £2 million for Cotterill" (Other Football) - Creosote Ah Um, May 12, 14:43:57
        
        then we had 1 million for howard then..whatever way you want to look at it... (Other Football) - Alan, May 12, 14:46:28
        
        Not necessarily (Other Football) - Creosote Ah Um, May 12, 14:49:29
      - not sure why we needed the Turner's cash injection to avoid selling players then (Other Football) - Dave in France, May 12, 14:42:52
    - you're forgetting the £2m we were going to spend on Cotterill (n/m) (Other Football) - blindasabat, May 12, 14:20:04
  - he'd have got injured playing on the right wing (n/m) (Other Football) - pants, May 12, 14:05:25
    - Lol - but unfortunately true (n/m) (Other Football) - KentonCanary, May 12, 14:45:19
  - "big lump, never worth a million" (n/m) (Other Football) - lurd, May 12, 14:02:51

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.