Apparently they were treated leniently

because they owned up to it. Which means they carried on playing Tevez even though they themselves agreed it was wrong.
And of course where was leniency when Bury reported their own administrative cock-up?

Posted By: Creosote Ah Um on April 30th 2007 at 10:11:58

Message Thread

West Ham (Other Football) - south, Apr 30, 09:56:03
- A good piece on KUMB - West Ham Site about the £5.5m fine (Other Football) - KentonCanary, Apr 30, 10:36:12
- AFC Wimbledon were deducted eighteen points... (Other Football) - Declan, Apr 30, 10:35:16
- Friday's "Fiver" was a good read, about West Ham (Other Football) - Arizona Bay, Apr 30, 10:34:04
- However... (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Apr 30, 10:31:07
- What do you expect? (Other Football) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 30, 10:02:09
  - Apparently they were treated leniently (Other Football) - Creosote Ah Um, Apr 30, 10:11:58
    - but then Bury (Other Football) - south, Apr 30, 10:12:51
      - Oh yeah (Other Football) - Creosote Ah Um, Apr 30, 10:17:07
  - remember that Lynn one (Other Football) - south, Apr 30, 10:06:15
- Leeds did something similar too i seem to recall, i think nothing ever came of that either (n/m) (Other Football) - Tony Martin, Apr 30, 10:01:07

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.