Both are clearly English words by origin, if you know your etymology
This is a bulls**tting technique I'm picking up from Worzel Scrimmage, by the way. I have no idea if it's true.
Posted By: Sugbad The Bad on February 22nd 2007 at 13:01:52
Message Thread
- FAO BucksYella (General Chat) - Sugbad The Bad, Feb 22, 12:55:10
- You said 'buddy' and 'quit' - thus, you must be Sugbad The Bad American. (n/m) (General Chat) - malkybarkid, Feb 22, 12:57:33
- he is (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 22, 12:59:25
- Both are clearly English words by origin, if you know your etymology (General Chat) - Sugbad The Bad, Feb 22, 13:01:52
- Wouldn't you need a (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 22, 13:03:29
- whooooosh, sorry. (n/m) (General Chat) - Sugbad The Bad, Feb 22, 13:05:07
- Etymology, entomology (General Chat) - Old Git, Feb 22, 13:20:11
- whooooosh, sorry. (n/m) (General Chat) - Sugbad The Bad, Feb 22, 13:05:07
- Wouldn't you need a (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 22, 13:03:29
- Both are clearly English words by origin, if you know your etymology (General Chat) - Sugbad The Bad, Feb 22, 13:01:52
- he is (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 22, 12:59:25
- You said 'buddy' and 'quit' - thus, you must be Sugbad The Bad American. (n/m) (General Chat) - malkybarkid, Feb 22, 12:57:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.