Unattributable sources ...
But why are they unattributable on Waghorn's site? Because they'll get into trouble with the club? Or rather, since it's likely that the sources are sanctioned by the club, to add a bit of mystery to his venture and to avoid ridicule from the punters. In short, he's committing a (albeit totally transparent) fraud upon his subscribers.
Posted By: BerlinCanary on February 7th 2007 at 12:25:19
Message Thread
- FAO 'east of hampstead' (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Feb 7, 11:02:34
- so, you are made redundant (NCFC) - east of hampstead, Feb 7, 11:46:01
- Unattributable sources ... (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Feb 7, 12:25:19
- Dubious plural there. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 7, 12:32:25
- *snigger* (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Feb 7, 13:47:37
- Dubious plural there. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 7, 12:32:25
- Unattributable sources ... (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Feb 7, 12:25:19
- so, you are made redundant (NCFC) - east of hampstead, Feb 7, 11:46:01
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.