I read somewhere that some of the ice ages went from normal to almost total

ice coverage in the space of 30 years.

I think the debate is whether it IS quick, or even if it IS permanent since many similar temporary changes in the past have been detected without apparent cause in rocks / ice etc.

Posted By: Steve in Holland on February 1st 2007 at 16:21:34

Message Thread

Gee....No Shit!!! (General Chat) - Ricochet Rabbit, Feb 1, 15:52:50
- "virtually certain" lol (n/m) (General Chat) - Tomblander, Feb 1, 15:55:47
  - Well it isn't as clear cut as you'd think... (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Feb 1, 16:14:57
    - isn't it the speed rather than simply the fact that it's getting warmer? (n/m) (General Chat) - mr carra, Feb 1, 16:17:51
      - I think that's the debate. But there is a debate is my point I suppose. (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Feb 1, 16:19:17
        
        But surely (General Chat) - Nanny McPrags, Feb 1, 16:22:36
        
        That's what killed the dinosaurs (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Feb 1, 16:24:28
        
        I thought that was cold (n/m) (General Chat) - Nanny McPrags, Feb 1, 16:26:18
        
        I read somewhere that some of the ice ages went from normal to almost total (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Feb 1, 16:21:34
- LOL (n/m) (General Chat) - Lovely old McJob, Feb 1, 15:53:43

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.