Yesterday proved for me that the situation at this club is a board fault only
when Grant took over, and the surrounding "but is he any good?" questions were asked
I remarked that I'd really hope Grant would get a chance, get the money and get the full and same backing as worthy
So far, he's had one 200k signing get injured, and has signed two mediocre players for 200k
It's back to the days of giving the manager no support, allowing them to get all the stick, then firing them when results don't show
I thought Delia and Michael said they had learnt something when they sacked Hamilton (and Rioch before him etc)
We're back to square one, and it's not grants fault 100%
Posted By: pants on February 1st 2007 at 09:54:57
Message Thread
- Yesterday proved for me that the situation at this club is a board fault only (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 09:54:57
- Hmm... Agree with pants and Yorkie to an extent, actually... (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 1, 10:43:33
- What are you talking about? (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 1, 10:30:08
- Didn't sack Hammy though did they? He walked (n/m) (NCFC) - Mcduke of York, Feb 1, 09:59:58
- They didn't sack Rioch though did they? He walked (NCFC) - Norman Norks, Feb 1, 10:11:02
- Fair enough then, it's all grants fault (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 10:12:30
- Personally I blame (NCFC) - Norman Norks, Feb 1, 10:22:01
- Bosh... (NCFC) - Brom, Feb 1, 10:29:05
- Unlike Thorne in the Prem. (n/m) (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Feb 1, 10:32:54
- I make that 2-0 (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Feb 1, 10:40:57
- Unlike Thorne in the Prem. (n/m) (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Feb 1, 10:32:54
- Ha ha....... (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Feb 1, 10:26:47
- Bosh... (NCFC) - Brom, Feb 1, 10:29:05
- Personally I blame (NCFC) - Norman Norks, Feb 1, 10:22:01
- Fair enough then, it's all grants fault (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 10:12:30
- respectable way of being sacked (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 10:04:54
- Vote of no confidence from the players (n/m) (NCFC) - Mcduke of York, Feb 1, 10:05:50
- this isn't a post about hamilton (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 10:07:38
- why mention him? (n/m) (NCFC) - Wee Jock McBrandonio, Feb 1, 10:10:43
- Lol 'Wee Jock McBrandonio' (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Feb 1, 10:17:42
- why mention him? (n/m) (NCFC) - Wee Jock McBrandonio, Feb 1, 10:10:43
- this isn't a post about hamilton (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 10:07:38
- Vote of no confidence from the players (n/m) (NCFC) - Mcduke of York, Feb 1, 10:05:50
- They didn't sack Rioch though did they? He walked (NCFC) - Norman Norks, Feb 1, 10:11:02
- sort of agree (NCFC) - Bacon, Feb 1, 09:59:56
- seems to me.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Feb 1, 10:05:22
- think it's the mix of players and a whole load of legacy issues (NCFC) - Tomblander, Feb 1, 10:05:14
- FAO: pants, Up there ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (NCFC) - Tomblander, Feb 1, 10:15:21
- Maybe they dont understand him? (NCFC) - conker, Feb 1, 10:01:09
- I can't stand the thought of our new yellow and green (NCFC) - Bacon, Feb 1, 10:03:53
- its the future (NCFC) - conker, Feb 1, 10:07:48
- I can't stand the thought of our new yellow and green (NCFC) - Bacon, Feb 1, 10:03:53
- cracking post (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Feb 1, 09:55:47
- thanks (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 09:58:08
- Don't fucking start you pair of cunts. (NCFC) - Aberdeen Bay, Feb 1, 09:59:33
- *pops head over fence* (NCFC) - Tomblander, Feb 1, 09:58:53
- "Hellllloooooo, paging pants" (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Feb 1, 10:06:11
- a bit (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 10:10:07
- ah, good post then. (NCFC) - Tomblander, Feb 1, 10:11:14
- a bit (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 10:10:07
- "Hellllloooooo, paging pants" (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Feb 1, 10:06:11
- thanks (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 09:58:08
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.