Think you're being unduly harsh there.
Thorne actually linked the play well today.
Although I have to agree that Martin looked good when he came on. Made some clever runs.
Posted By: Dog on January 30th 2007 at 22:55:27
Message Thread
- Just got back... (NCFC) - Dog, Jan 30, 22:12:35
- we need a striker and we'd have been ok would have been 4-0, thorne = shit (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jan 30, 22:16:59
- Didn't actually think Thorne played too badly... (NCFC) - Dog, Jan 30, 22:18:24
- agreed (NCFC) - megson, Jan 30, 22:26:01
- Bollocks (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 30, 22:50:05
- Think you're being unduly harsh there. (NCFC) - Dog, Jan 30, 22:55:27
- I really don't see the point of Thorne (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 30, 23:01:12
- he did (NCFC) - megson, Jan 30, 22:59:58
- Think you're being unduly harsh there. (NCFC) - Dog, Jan 30, 22:55:27
- Bollocks (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 30, 22:50:05
- agreed (NCFC) - megson, Jan 30, 22:26:01
- Didn't actually think Thorne played too badly... (NCFC) - Dog, Jan 30, 22:18:24
- at last a rational human being (NCFC) - megson, Jan 30, 22:15:09
- Calm down, perhaps the boos weren't for the players, but the board (n/m) (NCFC) - norfolkbroadslim, Jan 30, 22:18:32
- i doubt it! (NCFC) - megson, Jan 30, 22:26:27
- Even wolves fans saying we were excellent first half, players didnt deserve boos (n/m) (NCFC) - norfolkbroadslim, Jan 30, 22:19:13
- but the fans deserve a win. it hurts sometimes (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Jan 30, 22:22:26
- Calm down, perhaps the boos weren't for the players, but the board (n/m) (NCFC) - norfolkbroadslim, Jan 30, 22:18:32
- we need a striker and we'd have been ok would have been 4-0, thorne = shit (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jan 30, 22:16:59
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.