Have been supportive of Grant but......
just read Waghorns piece & see that he played Shacks on Saturday despite him being injured.
WTF he didnt play Dublin at the back I dont know - particulalry that when DD did play at the back we seemed a lot tighter.
In fact injury or not WHY HASN'T DUBLIN BEEN PLAYED IN DEFENCE???
Posted By: South_West_Canary on January 18th 2007 at 20:55:50
Message Thread
- Have been supportive of Grant but...... (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 18, 20:55:50
- Because Dubin wants to play upfront (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 21:41:42
- my kids want to play up front as does every kid, but no they are put in their position by (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 18, 21:57:58
- Cos the alternatives were (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jan 18, 21:06:54
- So what if Browns only been here 5 mins (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 18, 21:10:00
- I never said it was right (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jan 18, 21:18:32
- oh - ok. sorry! (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 18, 21:20:21
- I never said it was right (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jan 18, 21:18:32
- So what if Browns only been here 5 mins (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 18, 21:10:00
- Because Dubin wants to play upfront (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 21:41:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.