The BBC one?
Just trying to grasp what the prosecution are up to. What they have presented so far appears to amount to sweet FA when previous reports indicate that they have real hard evidence. So why not present the hardcore stuff? Surely the (presumably very well paid) lawyers wouldn't be spinning out the trial on public money?
Mate of mine was on jury service many years ago and found that's exactly what the prosecution did: open and shut case and one piece of evidence that had the crim bang to rights, which appeared on day 3 after much waffling that the Judge eventually cut short.
Posted By: BerlinCanary on January 17th 2007 at 15:59:56
Message Thread
- FAO Old Git (or other lawyers) (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Jan 17, 15:39:19
- Depends what they're doing (General Chat) - Old Git, Jan 17, 15:48:23
- See below (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Jan 17, 15:51:19
- That was a pretty short report (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Jan 17, 15:53:26
- The BBC one? (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Jan 17, 15:59:56
- That was a pretty short report (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Jan 17, 15:53:26
- See below (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Jan 17, 15:51:19
- dunt really matters if they're guilty or not, send them down anyway (General Chat) - Chops, Jan 17, 15:43:53
- Well, yes, of course (Cumbria anyway ...) (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Jan 17, 15:49:06
- Link ... (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Jan 17, 15:40:47
- Cumbria, Wales - superb, lol (n/m) (General Chat) - Everynowandagain, Jan 17, 15:42:20
- Oh yeah, Cumbria not Wales ... (n/m) (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Jan 17, 15:43:50
- Cumbria, Wales - superb, lol (n/m) (General Chat) - Everynowandagain, Jan 17, 15:42:20
- Depends what they're doing (General Chat) - Old Git, Jan 17, 15:48:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.