Buy land, sell the better players, build stands and facilities.....

As I have said before on this bb - where Chase went wrong was not raising money via a share issue when the club was doing very well. He probably didn't want to dilute his holding. In those days long term financing such as that for the Jarrold stand was not available to NCFC.

Now taking us back to the general operations (which is the focus of my original post) of the club, do you deny that the club has spent alot on the ground and facilities in the last four seasons ?

Do you deny that the current regime has sold our better players in the past just like Chase ?

Do you deny that the current regime has bought land
(ex LSE, ex City Council) just like Chase ?

Apart from the last couple of seasons under the Chase regime, please tell me how the regime's differ ?

Posted By: Commisar_Canary on January 8th 2007 at 10:11:40


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in