Player ratings
Gallacher - 5. Dodgy throughout.
Colin - 6. OK.
Doherty - 5. Pretty awful even against these players.
Shacks - 5. Ropey. How much of that is Doc's fault?
Drury - 6. Not as bad as some have made out.
Croft - 7. Worked tirelessly and a threat.
Safri - 7. Only decent passer of the ball at the club.
Etuhu - 4. Lazy and sloppy. Did nothing particularly well.
Hucks - 7. Not outstanding but scored 2 and made one.
Earnie - 4. Poor all round. Good.
Dublin - 8. A real pro - good all round. Shame he's our best defender too.
Subs:
Hughes - 4. Fitted in well at his true level.
Thorne - 3. Looked poor even at that level.
Robinson - 4. Not good enough in any way shape or form.
Posted By: duke of york on January 6th 2007 at 15:29:50
Message Thread
- Player ratings (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 6, 15:29:50
- So was Earnie poor or good? (NCFC) - crossan and bly, Jan 6, 15:39:06
- It says poor all round. Which is good. (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 6, 15:55:57
- he was quiet (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 6, 15:41:19
- So was Earnie poor or good? (NCFC) - crossan and bly, Jan 6, 15:39:06
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.