Difficult one. Haven't seen that much of Thorne, so would have to go for Coney - Wrath of the Barclay

Difficult one. Haven't seen that much of Thorne, so would have to go for Coney

But, Coney was totally f**king s**t, so if Thorne is worse then he's vying for worst ever player

Posted By: BerlinCanary on January 6th 2007 at 14:57:44

Message Thread

LOL at the Pinkun (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jan 6, 14:52:29
- YES (n/m) (NCFC) - Commisar_Canary, Jan 6, 15:01:46
- Difficult one. Haven't seen that much of Thorne, so would have to go for Coney (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 6, 14:57:45
- Difficult one. Haven't seen that much of Thorne, so would have to go for Coney (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 6, 14:57:44
- Definitely worse - worse player in last 20 years for me! (NCFC) - Poirot, Jan 6, 14:56:13
  - Cottee? Walsh? Benjamin? Derveld? Hmmmm - Thorne is a contender, isn't he... (n/m) (NCFC) - Peculiar Swan, Jan 6, 14:58:17
    - Cottee, Walsh and Benjamin at least didn't stick around for very long. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 6, 14:59:55
      - Agree (NCFC) - Poirot, Jan 6, 15:03:31
        
        I'd add Victor Segura to the list as well - dismal! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 6, 15:04:31
        
        Segura poor but..... (NCFC) - crossan and bly, Jan 6, 15:20:46
- on a par (n/m) (NCFC) - BufordTJustice, Jan 6, 14:53:28
- Yes. Yes he is. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 6, 14:53:25

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.