I think he's wrong not to include Safri, but right not to start with Croft...

Given that Croft couldn't last a full game at the start of the season, I can't see how he'd last more than 45 minutes after nearly 2 months without a game....and that's little use is it? Could be a useful impact sub though

Posted By: Orlando on December 16th 2006 at 14:49:04

Message Thread

I'll say it again. We are going to get thrashed today. Saf and Croft on bench, oh dear. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Duke of Norfolk, Dec 16, 14:46:40
- I think he's wrong not to include Safri, but right not to start with Croft... (NCFC) - Orlando, Dec 16, 14:49:04
  - Yeah, Saf should start though. Without Safri we hardly ever win. FACT. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Duke of Norfolk, Dec 16, 14:51:55
    - Except for Leicester, as mentioned below. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 16, 14:53:10
      - Arganth, Safri came on after 19 minutes against Leicester (n/m) (NCFC) - Orlando, Dec 16, 14:54:10
        
        don't confuse worthy lover Arganth with facts... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 16, 15:54:30
      - But we were better when he came on. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Duke of Norfolk, Dec 16, 14:53:57
        
        Then surely the stage is set ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 16, 14:54:17
  - I'm a bit surprised the Irish Piemuncher is on the bench (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Dec 16, 14:50:06
- we will try to keep them out (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Dec 16, 14:48:08

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.