I think that the general policy re football activities

is to set the budgets and then leave it to the manager. Which after all, is a pretty sensible policy.
They don't ask PG to get involved in real estate, catering. financial services etc. Because he's unlikely to be much of an expert in any of those fields. Likewise, PG is considered the football expert so thats his baby, so to speak.
There's no doubt whatsoever that the non football activities contribute substantial amounts of money to the club's coffers. These would then be avaiable to distribute as *wisely* as the board can manage. I.E. Some is reinvested into the non football activities to generate further additional income. The rest being made available for on field budget. It's all a bit of a balancing act, but one things for sure, we'd be far worse off financially if our only income stream was derived from footballing activities.

Posted By: mike_the_sphinx on December 7th 2006 at 10:31:40

Message Thread

Unbelievable!!!! (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Dec 7, 08:40:10
- doesnt sound that brilliant (NCFC) - downsey, Dec 7, 08:55:37
  - This is Norwich you know (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Dec 7, 09:25:00
    - None of these come before the team, The Board are trying to create revenue through various (NCFC) - lovely old job, Dec 7, 09:59:15
      - True (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Dec 7, 10:02:08
        
        I think that the general policy re football activities (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Dec 7, 10:31:40
        
        exactly, well said (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 7, 10:43:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.