i see your point
but i think svensson wanted to go, and he had a clause in his contract to let him leave if we went down. If we had offered him a new contract and then got relegated then i don't think much would have changed. If we had forced him to stay then we definitely wouldn't have got the best out of him anyway. thorne is pretty much a 'like for like' replacement.
I'm coming round to the idea.
Posted By: Dave in France on July 1st 2005 at 11:15:20
Message Thread
- oh super (NCFC) - ncfc dubai, Jul 1, 11:12:49
- Thorne - Free - Svenny - Received ?100k (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jul 1, 11:17:09
- No he isn't (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 1, 11:19:27
- i see your point (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jul 1, 11:15:20
- Dave - have a read of the EEN article if you can find it (NCFC) - oh arr, Jul 1, 11:20:47
- Thorne - Free - Svenny - Received ?100k (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jul 1, 11:17:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.