Maybe we've offered them a silly transfer price in Jan provided they loan him now?
That ?2m we were going to pay for the kid from Brizzle must be somewhere and Stoke only paid ?100k for him, so if we offered them (err) ?450k in Jan they'd see it as good business?
Posted By: Old Git on November 13th 2006 at 13:52:51
Message Thread
- Why would Stoke want to loan Chadwick? (NCFC) - Monty Peculiar, Nov 13, 13:50:32
- It isn't a loan at all. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 13, 13:55:44
- sssshhhhhhhh! they'll hear you... (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Nov 13, 13:57:26
- Except it isn't really naughty at all. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 13, 14:00:17
- ah well, that's alright then, panic over... (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Nov 13, 14:02:23
- Except it isn't really naughty at all. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 13, 14:00:17
- sssshhhhhhhh! they'll hear you... (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Nov 13, 13:57:26
- Maybe we've offered them a silly transfer price in Jan provided they loan him now? (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 13, 13:52:51
- The deal is.... (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 13, 13:54:27
- Isnt that illegal? (NCFC) - conker, Nov 13, 13:56:32
- The deal is.... (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 13, 13:54:27
- It isn't a loan at all. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 13, 13:55:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.