wages might not be a problem..

but veteran player trying to preserve his fitness (rather than putting his all into the long hard unglamourous slog of a Fizzy Pop season) for one last crack at the World Cup might be. I think we'd be much better off letting him go. Very much doubt his effort levels will be worth his wage costs otherwise.

Posted By: mr carra on June 28th 2005 at 11:19:53

Message Thread

I know we'd never get a fee. But does he have a clause (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 28, 10:56:28
- Again - that is nonsence. (NCFC) - HarryHelveg, Jun 28, 11:09:23
  - why not? we got him for free (NCFC) - mr carra, Jun 28, 11:16:59
  - really? I still think he'll go for nothing (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 28, 11:11:57
    - I don't think he'll go for free (NCFC) - HarryHelveg, Jun 28, 11:13:31
      - wages might not be a problem.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Jun 28, 11:19:53
        
        You could be right (NCFC) - HarryHelveg, Jun 28, 11:21:29
- Lazy journalism (NCFC) - Yellow Jersey, Jun 28, 11:01:22
  - It's like the Sky Sports wensite quoting "want away" Helveg... (NCFC) - Arganth, Jun 28, 11:06:26
    - well surely... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jun 28, 11:21:51
      - Lol you obviously don't have a young family to worry about. (NCFC) - Arganth, Jun 28, 11:28:29
        
        if you read what I said.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Jun 28, 11:35:20
- Similar to contract being cancelled by mutual consent... (NCFC) - Declan, Jun 28, 10:59:59
  - does it save the bother? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 28, 11:01:44
    - Sorry, doesn't read as well as it could do! (NCFC) - Declan, Jun 28, 11:07:14

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.