?1.5M on top of what we paid for Earnshaw!?
I don't think so
Posted By: Duck on October 18th 2006 at 22:33:25
Message Thread
- This is the sort of player we should be after... (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, Oct 18, 21:43:14
- Good sensible name too (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Oct 18, 21:47:31
- i agree great name.... (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, Oct 18, 21:49:21
- Match report on the official site shortly (n/m) (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Oct 18, 21:51:44
- i agree great name.... (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, Oct 18, 21:49:21
- Unless Crewe are prepared to let us to pay in smarties... (NCFC) - Duck, Oct 18, 21:45:23
- whys that duck? (n/m) (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, Oct 18, 21:49:48
- We're skint (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Oct 18, 21:50:58
- no we're not (n/m) (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, Oct 18, 22:03:23
- Yes we are (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Oct 18, 22:06:43
- no we're not (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 18, 22:07:41
- Yes we are (NCFC) - Duck, Oct 18, 22:09:28
- No we're not x infinity, no comebacks (NCFC) - Orlando, Oct 18, 22:25:28
- ?1.5M on top of what we paid for Earnshaw!? (NCFC) - Duck, Oct 18, 22:33:25
- Erm, but what about the 2 million plus fee we agreed for Cotteril? (NCFC) - Orlando, Oct 18, 22:35:42
- ?1.5M on top of what we paid for Earnshaw!? (NCFC) - Duck, Oct 18, 22:33:25
- No we're not x infinity, no comebacks (NCFC) - Orlando, Oct 18, 22:25:28
- Yes we are (NCFC) - Duck, Oct 18, 22:09:28
- no we're not (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 18, 22:07:41
- Yes we are (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Oct 18, 22:06:43
- no we're not (n/m) (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, Oct 18, 22:03:23
- We're skint (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Oct 18, 21:50:58
- whys that duck? (n/m) (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, Oct 18, 21:49:48
- Good sensible name too (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Oct 18, 21:47:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.