so basically we shouldn't get keegan..
because pants is good at copying and pasting!!
what about the money recouped?
i think keegan would be great for us....he'd stick a rocket up their ass that's for sure
Posted By: beckford on October 9th 2006 at 20:12:25
Message Thread
- If we can't have Alan Curbishley............ (NCFC) - Highlander, Oct 9, 18:56:46
- Incorrect (NCFC) - The King of Prussia, Oct 9, 21:16:19
- i bet most people on here were well chuffed (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Oct 9, 21:05:08
- did well at fullham (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Oct 9, 20:42:26
- I remember that Fulham team coming to york (NCFC) - pants, Oct 9, 20:43:59
- What's Keegan ever done (NCFC) - inutero, Oct 9, 19:06:07
- Probably best known for............ (NCFC) - Highlander, Oct 9, 19:23:45
- was awful for England (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 9, 19:56:31
- He's had success at a cost, done well for it, but at a cost (NCFC) - pants, Oct 9, 19:37:24
- so basically we shouldn't get keegan.. (NCFC) - beckford, Oct 9, 20:12:25
- I didn't say he wouldn't be good, and I didn't say we shouldn't get him (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 9, 20:19:37
- Good post, totally agree (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Oct 9, 19:44:17
- OK, I give in! (NCFC) - Highlander, Oct 9, 20:02:08
- so basically we shouldn't get keegan.. (NCFC) - beckford, Oct 9, 20:12:25
- Probably best known for............ (NCFC) - Highlander, Oct 9, 19:23:45
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.