The "10 game" thing was stated by a few stewards (both types) last year...
However, some people said that they might extend this to 15 games.
I just think they'll keep him in until things get ugly. Then they can play the "forced hand" thing to the media.
Posted By: Worf55 on September 24th 2006 at 20:43:25
Message Thread
- Waghorn: (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 24, 20:05:25
- The "10 game" thing was stated by a few stewards (both types) last year... (NCFC) - Worf55, Sep 24, 20:43:25
- why not keep Worthy for 20 years, give him a chance (n/m) (NCFC) - Commisar_Canary, Sep 24, 23:31:05
- You honestly think the board has no targets or limits? Just because they didn't agree... (NCFC) - greendude, Sep 24, 21:02:17
- hiow long a time scale - 4 years of failure poerhaps (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 24, 21:20:45
- Now were including promotion as failure are we? Jesus christ, just be rational. (n/m) (NCFC) - greendude, Sep 24, 21:24:06
- no... I was asking is 4 years your amount of failure required b4 sacking him? (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 24, 21:26:18
- Now were including promotion as failure are we? Jesus christ, just be rational. (n/m) (NCFC) - greendude, Sep 24, 21:24:06
- hiow long a time scale - 4 years of failure poerhaps (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 24, 21:20:45
- Last season he said that NW's judgement day would come after 10 games... (NCFC) - The Duke of Norfolk, Sep 24, 20:30:43
- The "10 game" thing was stated by a few stewards (both types) last year... (NCFC) - Worf55, Sep 24, 20:43:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.