none of those i saw were as bad as that
and fulham were hardly a bad side! though that was the worst home performance that season.
second half was a disgrace today and i'm not sure i'll ever see worse. should have finished 3-0 at least.
Posted By: SCC 26 on September 16th 2006 at 23:08:45
Message Thread
- worst home performance i've ever seen (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 22:55:51
- I suppose you must be defending hamilton then (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 02:09:45
- no (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 02:54:38
- you never saw any games under hamilton then? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:30:42
- hardly any (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:34:14
- you never saw any games under hamilton then? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:30:42
- you don't go to games (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 02:54:17
- explain why it was then (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:03:44
- i didn't plan on getting into a massive barney here (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:07:34
- cos there obviously has been far worse games than today (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:22:10
- my point was games I had seen (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:27:36
- lol (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:28:52
- so are we done now? (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:29:58
- you started off making a sweeping statement about today (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:34:09
- it was a personal statement actually (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:34:58
- you started off making a sweeping statement about today (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:34:09
- so are we done now? (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:29:58
- lol (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:28:52
- my point was games I had seen (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:27:36
- cos there obviously has been far worse games than today (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:22:10
- i didn't plan on getting into a massive barney here (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:07:34
- explain why it was then (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:03:44
- no (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 02:54:38
- not the worst (NCFC) - gazzathegreat, Sep 16, 23:45:35
- Not even the worst home performance against Palace (NCFC) - The Third Programme, Sep 16, 23:33:34
- Thank you for reminding me how awful we were at Preston & Delia was in the stand (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Sep 17, 00:18:11
- correct (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 23:38:43
- You haven't been going long then. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 16, 22:57:37
- only since 2001 regularly (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 23:01:02
- No, why should I ? (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 16, 23:01:42
- cos you clearly love worthington (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:02:09
- cos your point makes about as much sense as selling diet water (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:12:56
- not at all (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:17:05
- Nope. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 17, 03:12:27
- cos your point makes about as much sense as selling diet water (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:12:56
- name them (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 23:02:38
- Reading 2003 1-0 loss, on sky, it was a disgrace (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 02:05:34
- it was bad (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 02:41:00
- Wolves 2003, the last game we had as a hope of getting into the playoffs (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 02:06:39
- nobody expected anything (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 02:41:55
- actually I give up (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 02:08:13
- my point was games i had seen (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 02:48:42
- To be fair H, I did disprove his statement about 3 hours ago ;o) (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 17, 02:10:17
- no you fucking didn't (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 02:45:11
- what a prick, you just fish for the sake of it (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:04:53
- lmao (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:08:35
- a bad day now is it? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:15:47
- taking into account the opposition yes (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:18:29
- I don't think you do, that's the point (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:24:59
- erm i just made a small point (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:29:03
- I don't think you do, that's the point (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:24:59
- taking into account the opposition yes (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:18:29
- a bad day now is it? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:15:47
- lmao (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:08:35
- maybe that came across ott (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 02:57:31
- Except I came up with several examples of games that I had seen. (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 17, 02:57:07
- not really a cheap shot (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:01:15
- what a prick, you just fish for the sake of it (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 03:04:53
- no you fucking didn't (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 02:45:11
- Bradford, championship year. (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 16, 23:04:36
- Fulham, Premiership year. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 16, 23:04:55
- none of those i saw were as bad as that (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 23:08:45
- dont forget Luton, Derby, QPR and Southampton away last season (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Sep 17, 00:19:37
- HOME (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 01:19:12
- Bradford 4-1 2001/02? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 02:10:54
- remember it well (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 02:43:27
- Bradford 4-1 2001/02? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 02:10:54
- HOME (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 01:19:12
- dont forget Luton, Derby, QPR and Southampton away last season (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Sep 17, 00:19:37
- Just goes to prove one thing.... (NCFC) - ConcernedCanary, Sep 16, 23:07:27
- Yeah cos we've never had shite performances under any other manager. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 16, 23:16:29
- obviously we have, but so many? (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 16, 23:20:24
- Yep. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 16, 23:24:31
- I don't recall leaving the ground so angry with performances under other managers (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 16, 23:34:47
- Yep. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 16, 23:24:31
- obviously we have, but so many? (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 16, 23:20:24
- Absolutely, and that's not even considering the utter non-performances away (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 16, 23:11:10
- agreed (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 23:14:29
- we're just so one dimensional (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 16, 23:16:36
- i expect apologies from every level for that (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 23:21:57
- that's one of the major issues with him (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 16, 23:23:35
- i expect apologies from every level for that (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 23:21:57
- we're just so one dimensional (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 16, 23:16:36
- agreed (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 23:14:29
- Yeah cos we've never had shite performances under any other manager. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 16, 23:16:29
- none of those i saw were as bad as that (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 23:08:45
- Fulham, Premiership year. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 16, 23:04:55
- Reading 2003 1-0 loss, on sky, it was a disgrace (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 02:05:34
- cos you clearly love worthington (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 17, 03:02:09
- No, why should I ? (NCFC) - Arganth, Sep 16, 23:01:42
- only since 2001 regularly (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 16, 23:01:02
- I suppose you must be defending hamilton then (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 02:09:45
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.